Next, you will find also that people suggest that if you INSIST on staying with Access, you could at LEAST switch from using ODBC to using a JDBC driver. But no one has ever commented about whether it helped (or not). And notice that the SO post ended with a last suggestion of a very specific file to try running, which was different than those above it. You may even want to check out those posts (and their respective blogs or authors) to see if they may have an update, for the problem still happening on CF2018. First, you will find a pretty complete discussion of the matter in the CF11 timeframe at this SO post, which starts with links to two classic blog posts that shared more: And yes, the BEST answer really is to "get off Access".and yet many feel compelled or required to stay on it (or are just not put off enough yet to switch). But as you say, problems related to it have plagued CF for many years. I have to admit that I have not tried to use an Access DB with CF in a long time (and no client has pressed me to get it working for them).
#Valentina server odbc update#
Let us know how it goes. And in case it's helpful, let us know what CF update you are on. (Also, I notice that the link to the forum discussion which I offer in the post,, fails for some reason, but this works. Do give the fix a shot (finding the dll in the update backup folder, and copy it back into CF, per the docs or my post).
You can try what I (and that technote) suggest, and I suspect it will work.īack to how you are on CF2018, I will say at least that the last CF2018 update that had a technote with "known issues" was update 7 ( ), and it makes no mention of this issue. So first, I had done a blog post to summarize the key points from that very long thread:Īnd notice how I quote Adobe's own technotes from that era, about a "known issue" (in some of the updates), which said what to do. Granted, that discussion was about CF2016 and 11, and you are on CF2018, but perhaps the discussion still applies. I recall a discussion here in the forums in the past couple of years, where people reported that upon applying a certain CF update, they found this happened-because the update had REMOVED that file when it should not have (or it should have replaced it with an updated version). In addition to what Matt said, for personal projects with shoestring budget you can consider since datagrip requires subscription.OK, that rings a bell, then. In addition to those SQL clients, DBeaver is a great option too. Non-Profit looking to move from Lotus Approach to _ - questions However, on DBeaver, these suffixes don't show up in the table list - whereas, in TablePlus, they do. While most of my colleagues use DBeaver, I use TablePlus. Numeric table suffixes showing up in TablePlus.Also, it's officially available through flatpak and there's a copr as well. It is actively maintained, and users are invited to report bugs and suggest features on the DBeaver GitHub page.ĭBeaver Community, which is similar to workbench and takes little time to get used to. Apart from MariaDB, it supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, MS Access, MongoDB, Redis, and many more databases.
#Valentina server odbc free#
0 kommentar(er)
